The second season of the popular anime series Jujutsu Kaisen has captured widespread attention recently. The initial episodes explored the backstory of fan-favorite character Gojo Satoru, much to the delight of passionate viewers.
However, despite these appealing plotlines, a controversial development in the Jujutsu Kaisen manga has sparked intense debate among devoted fans.
In the manga chapter, the villainous Ryomen Sukuna kills Gojo Satoru, unexpectedly eliminating the most beloved character of the series.
This shocking narrative twist has ignited a firestorm of reactions on social media, with distraught fans venting their anger and dissatisfaction.
Some have even directed threats at manga author Gege Akutami over this surprising outcome of the climactic battle between heroes and villains.
Yet amidst all the turmoil, Akutami’s bold storytelling decision and willingness to upend expectations has also earned admiration in certain circles.
His defiant commentary on fictional events that carry such meaning for readers has left a thought-provoking impression.
As the Jujutsu Kaisen drama continues to unfold, the fan community grapples with the loss of an iconic character while contemplating the creative vision of the writer who dared to write such a fate.
How Gege Handled Death Threats?
During the past week, Akutami commented lightheartedly, “Due to the break, it seems I forgot to draw one chapter.”
Mangaka artists often share brief thoughts in the Weekly Shonen Jump magazine between manga installments. When the @JJK_Mya social media account posted this remark, it sparked an uproar among devotees.
Akutami Gege's Comment this week:
— JJK (Mya) (@JJK_Mya) September 21, 2023
Many felt confused and upset that the climactic battle ended so abruptly with Gojo’s unforeseen demise.
They viewed Akutami’s statement about forgetting a chapter during their break week as careless, given the vital importance of this storyline.
Even though the tone was comedic, fans saw overlooking such a crucial manga chapter as foolish.
The mangaka is likely to release the missing installment in the coming week. But the outrage sparked by Gojo’s premature death and Akutami’s perceived nonchalance shows the intense connections Jujutsu Kaisen followers feel to the characters and plot.
The emotional response reflects deep investment in the creative work, though some reactions have clearly crossed the line into inappropriate threats and harassment.
How Fans Reacted On Gojo’s Death
As described previously, devoted readers of the Jujutsu Kaisen manga are outraged by a major new plot twist. The intense response stems not only from unhappiness over story developments but also frustration with an apparent mistake made by author Gege Akutami.
Incensed fans have initiated social media hashtags like #GegeWhenICatchYou, #Gojo, and #JujutsuKaisen to channel their reactions.
Some have used profanity and hostile rhetoric, with one commenter writing “F*ck you Gege” in response to the controversial narrative choices.
Other enthusiasts have posted images of a Death Note manga prop with Akutami’s name scrawled inside, symbolizing desires for the writer’s demise after decisions that eliminated the beloved Gojo Satoru character.
While likely hyperbolic, these threats underscore the strength of allegiance some fans feel, as well as a lack of boundaries regarding appropriate ways to critique creative work.
In addition to vulgarity and threats, some aggrieved Jujutsu Kaisen fans have accused author Gege Akutami of arrogance bordering on comedy by making light of forgetting a crucial manga chapter.
They compare the ending of the previous installment, which set up an intense showdown, against the next release, where Gojo Satoru abruptly appears dead.
No logical narrative bridge connects these story beats, leaving devotees confused and angry. As one commenter @NORBOLOGY wrote bitingly, “It’s not only drawing that he forgot.” Some cling to a fragile hope that Gojo’s demise is not permanent, while most rage flows freely.
This public venting seems likely to persist until Akutami provides meaningful explanations or releases the missing content that prompts understanding.
No one expected perceived sloppiness from such an esteemed manga artist. For now, the facts show Gojo dead and villain Ryomen Sukuna victorious due to implications of the mangaka thoughtlessly skipping vital plot points.
While demanding excellence from creative talents has merits, the intense hostility and lack of empathy many fans demonstrate reflects immaturity and questionable priorities.
At the end of the day, fiction should entertain and inspire but not dictate personal worth or incite real-world hostility.