Elon Musk‘s social media platform X has stirred controversy by refusing to comply with a regulator’s order to remove posts depicting the stabbing of an Australian bishop during a sermon.
X defended its decision, asserting that the footage, captured by an “innocent bystander,” contributes to public discussion and should not be banned under Australian law.
Contrary to Australian lawmakers’ concerns that the video could incite violence or radicalization, X maintains that the content does not encourage or provoke such actions.
The platform’s stance has ignited a debate over free speech and regulatory authority.
The e-Safety Commissioner had instructed X to globally remove posts containing the video to prevent Australians from accessing them.
X challenged the order, citing concerns about the jurisdictional reach of the directive. A court temporarily upheld the takedown order pending further hearings.
The dispute has sparked public exchanges between Musk, a self-proclaimed advocate of free speech, and Australian officials, including the prime minister.
Musk has criticized the order, suggesting it is part of a broader agenda to impose restrictive regulations on digital platforms.
Musk’s platform shares have intensified the controversy by endorsing claims that the takedown order is part of a conspiracy to impose eSafety rules globally.
This endorsement has further fueled tensions between Musk and Australian authorities.
The disagreement unfolds against the backdrop of a recent attack on an Assyrian bishop in Sydney, resulting in charges against a 16-year-old for terrorist offenses.
Subsequent police raids led to the arrest of five associates, all teenagers, on terrorism-related charges, including possession of extremist material.
