Should Anime Like ‘High School DxD’ Be Considered Porn? New Court Case Says Yes

Thread 2
High School DxD

High School DxD

A legal battle is underway in the United States to determine whether ecchi anime series like High School DxD should be classified as pornographic material. The case has sparked intense debate among legal experts, free speech advocates, and anime enthusiasts, highlighting the complex intersection of art, law, and societal values.

The U.S. legal system has grappled with the status of fictional depictions of minors in sexual contexts. The PROTECT Act of 2003 criminalizes certain obscene visual representations of minors, including drawings and cartoons, if they are deemed obscene under the Miller test.

Legal Context and Precedents

High School DxD
High School DxD

This test evaluates whether the material appeals to prurient interests, depicts sexual conduct in a patently offensive way, and lacks serious literary, artistic, political, or scientific value. Notably, the Act distinguishes between actual child pornography and fictional depictions, with the latter requiring an obscenity determination. 

In previous cases, individuals have faced convictions for possessing obscene anime and manga. For instance, in 2005, Dwight Whorley was convicted of receiving and distributing obscene Japanese anime cartoons depicting minors in sexual situations. Similarly, in 2008, Christopher Handley pleaded guilty to possessing obscene manga, resulting in a six-month prison sentence.

Implications for the Anime Community

High School DxD
High School DxD

The current case has significant implications for the anime community. Classifying ecchi anime as pornographic could lead to stricter regulations on the distribution and consumption of such content, affecting both creators and fans. Supporters of the classification argue that it is necessary to protect societal morals and prevent potential harm, while opponents contend that it infringes on artistic freedom and free speech.

Legal experts note that the outcome of this case could set a precedent for how fictional content is treated under U.S. law. The challenge lies in balancing the protection of minors and societal values with the rights to free expression and artistic creation.

As the legal proceedings continue, the anime community remains divided, with passionate arguments on both sides regarding the classification of ecchi anime and its place within the broader context of media and culture.

Verified since 2020 Senior Content Writer

Steve Markus Johanson is a Senior Content Writer at OtakuKart and one of the publication's most prolific contributors, with nearly 1,000 published articles. A dedicated content writer, he devotes himself to spreading manga and anime throughout the world, with strong focus on creator interviews, studio strategy, and chapter-level analysis.

THREAD 2

Share your take. All comments are held for review before appearing.

  • Murad

    WTF? We as in adults got the right to choose what we watched. We had and still do have adult cartoons. We’ve watched them as kids and didn’t had any negative effects. Some of us are parents now, we are aware and become more aware what our children can and cannot watch. Government shouldn’t decide what we can and cannot watch, it’s a responsibility as the parents. Having them say, it’s for the children, it’s always been their scapegoat.

    Also Game of Thrones contains more of that content than High School DxD does. By that logic, should Game of Thrones also be considered porn?
    A show containing nudity in and of itself does not automatically make it porn. It is simply a show made for adults.

  • Blue

    It is prnohraphic? What’s even the debate. The only reason most people are trying to deny that is because they WANT to watch ecchi. If you had no reason to watch it then you wouldn’t care. Just like if they started covering up the characters in DxD would that change your opinion of the show? It shouldn’t if it’s actually an anime you like to watch so why does nudity seem to be such a necessary factor?

    Sounds like bias to me.