A federal judge in San Diego blocked the enforcement of California’s recent law allowing lawsuits against firearms manufacturers and sellers for producing or distributing “abnormally dangerous” guns.
The ruling, a blow to Democratic Governor Gavin Newsom’s gun control efforts, stems from a lawsuit filed by the National Shooting Sports Foundation (NSSF), arguing that the law violates constitutional provisions, including the Second Amendment and the dormant Commerce Clause.
Judge Andrew Schopler, appointed by President Joe Biden, focused on the Commerce Clause issue, finding that the law likely interferes with interstate commerce by extending liability beyond California’s borders. He issued a preliminary injunction preventing the state’s Attorney General from suing NSSF members while the legal challenge progresses.
The law, part of California’s Firearm Industry Responsibility Act, was passed in response to a Supreme Court ruling that expanded gun rights. Newsom had touted it as a means to hold firearm manufacturers accountable for the harm caused by their products.
However, opponents argue that it unfairly burdens the firearms industry and infringes on constitutional rights.
While the ruling is seen as a victory for the NSSF and a setback for Newsom’s administration, it’s not the end of the legal battle. Both sides are considering next steps, with Newsom’s office highlighting that certain provisions of the law, such as measures targeting unlawful transactions, remain intact despite the ruling.
The decision raises questions about states’ ability to regulate the firearms industry and the balance between public safety concerns and constitutional rights. It also underscores the ongoing debate over gun control measures in the United States, with differing perspectives on how to address gun violence while respecting individual liberties.
