In a development that has reignited intense debate within the K-pop community, NewJeans (also referred to as NJZ) has become the subject of widespread plagiarism allegations.
A series of viral social media posts and videos have surfaced, claiming that the group’s choreography and creative direction bear striking resemblances to the work of several established girl groups, including GFriend, Weeekly, and LE SSERAFIM.
These accusations come at a particularly sensitive time, as the industry continues to grapple with heated discussions regarding artistic originality and the “copying” controversies that have dominated recent headlines.
Detailed Comparisons and Viral Evidence
The controversy gained significant traction following the release of a compilation video that juxtaposes NewJeans’ dance routines with performances from other groups that took place months or even years prior.
Critics have pointed out specific choreography sequences—ranging from footwork patterns to formation transitions—that appear to overlap with Weeekly’s signature style and GFriend’s famously synchronized “power innocence” routines.
Furthermore, some netizens have noted similarities with LE SSERAFIM’s more recent performances, suggesting a pattern of “borrowing” moves that have already been popularized by their peers.
One particular post on the community site theqoo went viral, questioning why NewJeans was invited to a National Assembly audit regarding industry issues when other groups, such as Weeekly, allegedly had their creative concepts “recycled” without credit.
This sentiment reflects a growing frustration among some fans who believe that NewJeans has been unfairly credited with pioneering certain aesthetics or movements that were actually established by lesser-known or senior groups.
Netizen Debate: Coincidence or Malice?
The public reaction to these allegations has been sharply divided. On one side, many netizens have expressed shock at the degree of similarity shown in the comparison videos, with some labeling the group’s creative team as “malicious” or “shameless.”
This camp argues that the sheer volume of overlapping moves across multiple artists makes the “coincidence” defense difficult to accept.
On the other hand, many fans and industry observers have come to the group’s defense, arguing that the K-pop industry has reached a point of creative saturation.
This argument suggests that because there are only a limited number of ways the human body can move in a pop choreography context, overlaps are inevitable and often unintentional.
These defenders point out that every new group is influenced by those who came before them, and that “plagiarism” is a heavy term that should not be used lightly.
Also Read: NewJeans’ Danielle Spotted on a Morning Run with Singer Sean Amid Legal Dispute with ADOR
The Impact on the ILLIT Controversy
Interestingly, these new accusations against NewJeans have caused many to re-evaluate the previous “copycat” controversy involving the rookie group ILLIT.
For months, ILLIT faced severe backlash from NewJeans fans who accused them of imitating NewJeans’ concept and choreography.
Now, critics are pointing out a perceived double standard, asking why ILLIT was “beaten to death” over similarities while NewJeans’ own overlaps with groups like Weeekly and GFriend were initially ignored or excused.
As the discussion continues to unfold, the controversy highlights the complex nature of intellectual property in the fast-paced K-pop world.
While NewJeans remains one of the most successful acts globally, these allegations have prompted a deeper look into the role of producers and performance directors in maintaining artistic integrity.
For now, the group and their agency have not issued an official statement regarding these specific comparisons, leaving fans and critics to continue debating where the line between “inspiration” and “plagiarism” truly lies.
